Re: welcome new members and AI map

Happy New Year to all

Owen, a special recognition to you for being the one doing work on this
list :-)
thank you

to have the definition out of pdf is worthy, we should inform the expert
group that their va;uable definition is now available as preseable content
http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#AIHLEG

The definition itself may also benefit from being evaluated, I wonder if
there is a formal way to
evaluate a definition (Enrico?) apart from its representation

My proposition for the new year:  to enter  links and resources shared on
this list
into our web forms, listed somewhere on the group work pages

Peace

PDM

I

On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 2:15 AM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote:

> The AIHLEG's "definition" of AI is now available in StratML format at
> http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#AIHLEG
>
> The focus on the achievement of goals is encouraging.  It would be good if
> they were documented in an open, standard, machine-readable format like
> StratML, in which case AI could be more effectively applied to achieve them.
>
> For objectives that are common, it is unfortunate that the value chain is
> commonly reinvented rather than referenced and reused -- particularly when
> other people's money is being spent, e.g., by government, scientific, and
> charitable organizations.
> http://stratml.us/references/oxygen/PerformancePlanOrReport20160216_xsd.htm#ValueChainStageType
>
> Owen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 10:39 PM
> To: Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
> Cc: public-aikr@w3.org
> Subject: Re: welcome new members and AI map
>
> Thank you Enrico
> We should definitely use what is already available, if possible In
> addition to Milton comment, is everyone else happy with the definition
> shared by Enrico, and can we adopt it for this group, or does anyone have
> any suggestions for further elaboration/modification?
>
> I am not happy about the fact that it's in PDF, for start. :-) excuse me
> but how absurd is that?
>  Will read and share comments if any
>
> PDM
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 7:04 PM Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > you may want to refer to the much more solid document (and the map
> therein) produced on the 18th of December 2018 by the European Commission’s
> High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence: "A Definition of AI:
> Main Capabilities and Scientific Disciplines":
> > https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/definition-artifici
> > al-intelligence-main-capabilities-and-scientific-disciplines
> >
> > cheers
> > --e.
> >
> > On 17 Dec 2018, at 08:29, Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Enrico
> >
> > nice to hear from you-
> > thanks for reply
> >
> > Perhaps then, we could create a better version of this map How to go
> > about it?
> >
> > I started a concept map but have not yet finished the required reading
> > to complete it this is why I am happy to see someone else mapping the
> > domain, but not quite sure its correct, comprehensive enough-
> >
> > What I like is the map and the summary of AI subdomains, which is what
> > we started here
> >
> > we can then publish something that could be useful, given that you say
> > the representation in the article is wrong we should definitely try to
> > point it out
> >
> > PDM
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:21 PM Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 17 Dec 2018, at 02:04, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > if people think this is good enough
> >
> >
> > It is as bad as I can imagine.
> > The symbolic and sub-symbolic parts are filled with non-sense, and lack
> all the relevant parts.
> > What can we expect from a "tech investor and AI technologist" writing on
> Forbes?
> > I don't even believe that the proposed tri-partition is a useful one.
> > cheers
> > --e.
> >
> >
>
>
>