RE: Opening the AI Black Box

Key points set forth in a report from the National Association of State CIOs entitled "Ready for Primetime? State Governments Tune in to Artificial Intelligence” include:  

 

* make AI a part of a goals-based, citizen-centric program
* mitigate ethical risks and avoid AI decision making
* augment employees, do not replace them 

 

https://www.nascio.org/Portals/0/AI%20%20Machine%20Learning_FINAL.pdf 

 

Here's the original source:  <https://ash.harvard.edu/files/ash/files/artificial_intelligence_for_citizen_services.pdf> https://ash.harvard.edu/files/ash/files/artificial_intelligence_for_citizen_services.pdf

 

Owen Ambur

Chair,  <http://stratml.us/> StratML Working Group

Co-Chair Emeritus,  <http://xml.govwebs.net/> xml.gov CoP

Webmaster,  <http://firmcouncil.org/> FIRM

 <https://www.linkedin.com/in/owenambur> Profile on LinkedIn | Personal  <http://ambur.net/> Home Page

 

 

From: ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com> 
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 10:10 AM
To: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>; public-aikr@w3.org
Subject: Re: Opening the AI Black Box

 

The Government of the Netherlands also uses algorithmic decision making systems for arriving at court verdicts in cases where the court cases do not really require a magistrate to make a decision.

 

These systems are however creating a growing resistance, and require a legal redress system where a human reviews AI errors made.

 

Sounds counterproductive, doesn't it?

 

Milton Ponson
GSM: +297 747 8280
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development

 

[deleted]