- From: carl mattocks <carlmattocks@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 11:02:05 -0400
- To: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>
- Cc: public-aikr@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAHtonu=TUi20xrT_7VuogUQQ0oUaZy2XSfM+U+0nL59RmJDaqg@mail.gmail.com>
I am ok with Knowledge Ownership that is based on stewardship and not just a legal defense meta-theory for intellectual property. Simply put, I have observed that contributors are more willing to give support to a proposed Knowledge Representation when decisions are crafted using the Delphi Technique. Carl It was a pleasure to clarify On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:38 PM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > Carl > > thanks for intro and offering a reference > > > when you say: > (2) knowledge is best stewarded as a property of a > community-of-practice;\ > > I dont consider knowledge as property, presuming you mean ownership, not > property as eigenshaft/attribute > Not that it matters for the purpose of what is being done what you > describe seems to fit th definition of knowledge as commons, common > ownership in not necessarily property > Is knowledge ownership acceptable to you? > > regarding the reference, I have created some forms to facilitate the > collection/management task, do these forms work for everybody? > > General Resources > https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/welcome/ai-kr-task-list/ > knowledge-sources-for-ai-kr/ > Terms > https://www.w3.org/community/aikr/welcome/ai-kr-task-list/vocabulary/ > > > > Dr Paola Di Maio > Center For Technology Ethics > ISTCS.org > *A bit about me <https://about.me/paoladimaio>* > >
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2018 15:08:18 UTC