Re: Understanding SC 2.5.8: Target Size (Minimum) (Level AA) potential edit from David Berman

Hi Alastair,

Thank you very much.

Regarding the descending letters, I agree it's a minor part of the issue;
however, for example in PDF (and my comment is specifically about a
situation that arises digital books (PDF, EPUB, etc) the link areas is
indeed painted by the authoring tool around the entire word block (thus a
descender does indeed make it taller).

More broadly, I'm a huge fan of this success criterion, especially, for
example, in navigation menus in HTML, including the 24px height: we
encourage our clients to do this every time.

Rather, this arose for us when validating a textbook EPUB. Having to have
18pt or greater linespace between the two rows of a TOC entry that happens
to wrap onto 2 lines. And so I'm arguing that the "inline" exception should
be worded or interpreted to apply to TOC entries in the same way it applies
to linked text that is within a paragraph of text in an article on
nytimes.com .

I'd love your further take on this.

Thanks!
David




On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 at 04:39, Alastair Campbell <
alastair.campbell@thisisgain.com> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> *>  in order to fulfil your instructions and not be able to use the
> “Inline” exception, that one would have to increase the line spacing
> between consecutive baselines of the wording in the entire TOC to at least
> 24 pixels (even more if there are descending letters, such as y or p, which
> there are bound to be).*
>
> In web (and I think PDFs) I don’t think the size of the link is affected
> by whether it has descending letters.
>
> But overall, yes, if all the text is contained in the link the
> inline-exception is not applicable. It is not necessarily related to
> letter-size, you could buffer the link size without increasing text size.
>
> Overall, 24px of height is not very much for users to accurately hit,
> particularly for people with mobility impairments.
>
> An HTML default list of links has a height of about 19-20px by default
> already, so it’s a minor bump in size/spacing of the targets.
>
> Also, if your workflow isn’t HTML, note that “points" are not the same
> size as pixels. The ratio between sizes in points and CSS pixels is 1pt =
> 1.333px, therefore 14pt and 18pt are equivalent to approximately 18.5px and
> 24px.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Alastair
>
>
> *From: *David Berman <berman@davidberman.com>
> *Date: *Monday, 11 August 2025 at 17:47
> *To: *public-agwg-comments@w3.org <public-agwg-comments@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Understanding SC 2.5.8: Target Size (Minimum) (Level AA)
> potential edit from David Berman
>
> You don't often get email from berman@davidberman.com. Learn why this is
> important <https://u5854113.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.TruWcfStDA3rMeBhnDmEZsmjQzC6G9lRMvYv-2BBSD2yOgCHts7PfojYQ8M4rhK-2BR0J9YNA5qpvb9ReB1l3PMmwA-3D-3DYXB3_2C9kj0upxMObWw1Pw1sux7n8ATq630uX2EmJrrxRSHp4Gve5sSC1EqOYFWro0i9i1UG4dlfmZgPjds2YXZ-2BCnN3EUp6qc57lvrb1gpN9YfP43xEfVlifN3tu583nrCgBxeiFFbSvlvY5JOwfnhhXsGfIjnSktAa9GB0g07q4SKoIp-2B9s4vRggxcRqNPl9hjo-2FDNkSzkqU6uO6sD76ohJ-2Fg-3D-3D>
>
> Hi committee,
>
> Thank you again for all the amazing work!
>
> Regarding the following existing wording within Understanding SC 2.5.8:
> Target Size (Minimum) (Level AA):
>
> *“Except when... Inline: The target is in a sentence or its size is
> otherwise constrained by the line-height of non-target text;”*
>
> If one follows the guidance you provide here, there are situations where
> people are going to do the opposite of what I’m confident you would have
> hoped they would do. Let me explain by example...
>
> Consider a Table of Contents within a 100-page EPUB or PDF file of a
> textbook where each entry in the Table of Contents has the entire entry
> hypertext linked (to take you, for instance, to the first page of a
> chapter). One would hope that the “Inline” exception would apply; however,
> the target is not “in a sentence” nor is it “constrained by the line-height
> of non-target text” (because all of the text surrounding it also has
> targets). Thus, it would seem that in order to fulfil your instructions and
> not be able to use the “Inline” exception, that one would have to increase
> the line spacing between consecutive baselines of the wording in the entire
> TOC to at least 24 pixels (even more if there are descending letters, such
> as y or p, which there are bound to be). This would result in a typical TOC
> in a textbook that spanned perhaps 3 book pages now spanning 6 or more book
> pages. And if there are dot leaders, the gap is even more extreme. If you
> agree that this is an undesirable outcome, then the vocabulary of the
> exception should be broadened to allow for the arrangement of text that I
> am describing to also fall within the exception.
>
> Would you agree, or should we indeed insist that such TOCs have at least
> 24 pixels between TOC elements?
>
> And if you do agree, would you like help with the proposed wording (as I
> have ideas on how we get there without tradeoffs)?
>
> - David Berman CPWA, ADS
>
>
>
> --
> David Berman, RGD, FGDC, CPWA
> <https://u5854113.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.TruWcfStDA3rMeBhnDmEZqm-2BjnYyCyoGd3BNlAmM63DltZgYYvo2YVzPqzUxwi7weG8aaJKejRPyJH2KtNvjiNPQqcIUMTMKyLGLMm7uSpLTpMACsQ04ZVjkLAVUESepbbT-2Bft0ZnQLmNy4urLFKGBRDd-2FkyioYLRv-2BmZ2nFYqdHPPR2XU2RDIch9WrHTfdvJ0x72W0yWQYhqdQXP2TK8b5Atwwypma9Rx21dNHyiABZb4F5G5Q63pjyMZYKhNtkCe6Z34Himg3oxRFr-2BLLDcOmJbTDptN1MBS1-2BdVQuL-2FzvmBBDDZhY4NRchpPNtyY5DNETzN7eLtHxX-2BOLW9YHo9u-2Bge5PpYfeAX36rQhzC-2FxQnLcv91GW4Se6olEhyg3XVjX9xtYqLnINkWsHTazUIYpT3fI-2BwVOgsRtmbRGZyj9vZ1FXBCpi4uhAnvBkop6JRPtjxn4Uexr1Dcx3I7ZRv9127To3CKMykPkKOP7HJkv3q4wps3xtUKv2N14x9rSn5maKBAMKeuYZLXSyWJIWKw-3D-3DIp7Y_2C9kj0upxMObWw1Pw1sux7n8ATq630uX2EmJrrxRSHp4Gve5sSC1EqOYFWro0i9i1UG4dlfmZgPjds2YXZ-2BCnHK1UOn-2B1z2yqHXAYstAkN07NmTF74ZW0LxwClaOlsT14trWg1P91jL799NUVv-2BEu1R-2FtXsr5Gi88PaYuB28Et6QLtcQO7XSR88iOSdz6pHvwrU2xMhZpZkB7IcPee90WQ-3D-3D>,
> ADS
> <https://u5854113.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.TruWcfStDA3rMeBhnDmEZqm-2BjnYyCyoGd3BNlAmM63DltZgYYvo2YVzPqzUxwi7weG8aaJKejRPyJH2KtNvjiNPQqcIUMTMKyLGLMm7uSpLTpMACsQ04ZVjkLAVUESepbbT-2Bft0ZnQLmNy4urLFKGBRDd-2FkyioYLRv-2BmZ2nFYqdHPPR2XU2RDIch9WrHTfdv1vIiLEE2iN-2BfSyfVPO-2BZMz8q4g5SU0BtoNMi0z62YGJIFuRJ4EVy85avhZrw-2FZBzoX3M4AjlJ0VGjxienCs-2Bbjlf52mDc9cJ3AMb7qxcPoE-2FB-2FhRpEJ2MDyvLi21QD0sP2WwgErTDUXzBDgM52mOWiuOA0Kn9wDdf9qzHVrOJSLJYVDnrTk0xm-2Bf-2B-2B8qpgFFaFsb9h0jzQSZ7dmc58FaSA2m9gfdmKvmT5cw5AhXQlpIBIMJOxqCK3N6VN8Rsn1f96rBcvNzsgKEc1HmGfLygwN3CRS3QNva2B0LcqvYsilvefIKEDq5QrRwxp1U3CjGEXXNC4i0sI-2Bwe-2FaolRfXfQ-3D-3D-Yt2_2C9kj0upxMObWw1Pw1sux7n8ATq630uX2EmJrrxRSHp4Gve5sSC1EqOYFWro0i9i1UG4dlfmZgPjds2YXZ-2BCnBAB7md1NJbAGlx9OWKJitS9ANnKQqHrumfq4hQqo-2F8xZmFXKt5uI2dzRZZWmlUWQEn95BdbhwVayiI4dUO4RJ9In1N0W2a-2BxSSRhZ06PvWsJ-2B-2BnW1EPHiNKitllBoqGFQ-3D-3D> |
> LinkedIn
> he/him
> David Berman Communications | berman@davidberman.com | @davidberman
> +1-613-728-6777 | 340 Selby Avenue, Ottawa K2A 3X6
>
> High Level Advisor, United Nations | Invited Expert, W3C | Global chair,
> International Association of Accessibility Professionals | Carleton
> University Access Network chair
> Next accessibility event: 14 November 2024 (buy a ticket now and get the
> past recording and learning guide immediately) davidberman.com/next
> <https://u5854113.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.TruWcfStDA3rMeBhnDmEZqm-2BjnYyCyoGd3BNlAmM63DltZgYYvo2YVzPqzUxwi7wCC5C8XrvjQBnfrgvmFSPPYGdtLXJhPcZ1icEA-2FU86uFM5cg-2F2A9l2NiJw5stl96sYoFEIBnVZDbSo-2FC97WgUHvvFaDWgsdKYLDD3UnnYA2Z7f6-2FPisetF8yXFVTMsyLGXf2WhOWuz5EZfdomuDXtLNarffpJVDVQbzFbROGGJKzpj5DmHQuelA-2BWYjlDlnf6okBh-2F444gX4gI9BfF0PUa7EpXfMycovlajzac-2BbpVPFfuNGCCEdXDteRXJsuBsklvwlpmygO1v4y-2BUA4Uqdi-2FH7FZgLPoAxamyuQdaUpCa-2BCMK8j0IGpJYLaChL8-2BgxFzwHTT7pKeC2xI5iCW2aUtvP97CxWplYNcNZ-2FtviPQf4mkytbg4vEYecJWVLC-2FEIhMUouqh1GV3rOgGOr3nHFvN3h9LF0HNQj4bH2QV5MVcQ-3DmhD2_2C9kj0upxMObWw1Pw1sux7n8ATq630uX2EmJrrxRSHp4Gve5sSC1EqOYFWro0i9i1UG4dlfmZgPjds2YXZ-2BCnDcNiDTG2WovWqZrwv7rACRN2QkGkpI0SNnmBEeffMxPSTmkzCyubfH2jId8cdXHCW3LSPXw02XyhikUT-2Blpbp8EajumxkBZHA5XQxxsQglAa9SN5j9IgxWh7FwVTNsNIg-3D-3D>
> Do Good book news: "Don't just do good design ... do good!"
> I respectfully and gratefully acknowledge that the work I do takes place
> on unceded Algonquin Anishinaabe territory.
>
> This message may contain proprietary information. Unauthorized
> disclosure/copying/distribution of contents prohibited.
>


-- 
David Berman, RGD, FGDC, CPWA
<https://u5854113.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.TruWcfStDA3rMeBhnDmEZnEqhWqE2EzM6uwvjvFBRAliVPmjm1f963X3pX0vVQlePN7D8kA424BkhvGZcWWLig-3D-3Dlqtc_2C9kj0upxMObWw1Pw1sux7n8ATq630uX2EmJrrxRSHp4Gve5sSC1EqOYFWro0i9i1UG4dlfmZgPjds2YXZ-2BCnNWM4AVJ-2FFq7sc92C7VgBH6hdNMKDCI0TZcdTX3ld8w3HzIn6FKKFS6Eoe4xk-2FYoWwLcvCSzotALfAMQd1uJPdKCnT5MzxiqkSPCEvVW9oNcXN4etG0qyJf6rihHVddyrQ-3D-3D>, ADS
<https://u5854113.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.TruWcfStDA3rMeBhnDmEZnEqhWqE2EzM6uwvjvFBRAliVPmjm1f963X3pX0vVQlePN7D8kA424BkhvGZcWWLig-3D-3DxI7C_2C9kj0upxMObWw1Pw1sux7n8ATq630uX2EmJrrxRSHp4Gve5sSC1EqOYFWro0i9i1UG4dlfmZgPjds2YXZ-2BCnM6jiruvpf8oDibG-2BLwTyt1YmhqLmNd8oQfahv-2BXsO7StKKsq7SWmi1TPWQl5p7sFzYwSv5yvZKSOcDg2whiP-2FjIeP76mNAfhlCpXHHLDwzmjgTWJ02nJFGI9OTLpEqLpA-3D-3D> | LinkedIn
David Berman Communications | berman@davidberman.com | @davidberman
+1-613-728-6777 | 340 Selby Avenue, Ottawa K2A 3X6

Received on Thursday, 21 August 2025 20:55:25 UTC