W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-agwg-comments@w3.org > September 2020

RE: [WCAG 2.2 Working Draft] Preference on Organizing Feedback?

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:23:59 +0000
To: Dahlia Shoukry <dshoukry@google.com>
CC: "public-agwg-comments@w3.org" <public-agwg-comments@w3.org>, AGWG Chairs <group-ag-chairs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DB8PR09MB333914B8E1949B7CD92C3619B93F0@DB8PR09MB3339.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
HI Dahlia,

Apologies for the delay, it’s very hectic at the moment.

I think option 1 is probably best, as it helps to categorise things per-criterion.

The broken links type things could be separate, it’s that’s easy to do, as there will be a general clean up in the publication process.

Kind regards,


From: Dahlia Shoukry <dshoukry@google.com>
Sent: 17 September 2020 05:20
To: AGWG Chairs <group-ag-chairs@w3.org>
Cc: public-agwg-comments@w3.org
Subject: [WCAG 2.2 Working Draft] Preference on Organizing Feedback?


I hope this note finds you well during what I'm sure is an especially busy week.

I wanted to clarify your preferred method for us to submit our feedback. We have feedback about WCAG 2.2 overall, a summary of feedback for each SC, and very specific comments for each SC (questions, proposed text, and minor things like grammar, broken links, etc.).

Would you prefer that we:

  1.  Open one GitHub issue with overall 2.2 feedback, and then nine additional issues for the  SC, each with its own Google Doc containing a top level summary and specific comments
  2.  Open one GitHub issue with overall 2.2 feedback, a second issue summarizing feedback for each of the nine SCs, and third issue with a Google Doc for all of the minor comments like grammar, broken links, etc.?
  3.  Submit in a different way? :-)


Dahlia Shoukry |
 Program Manager - Accessibility |
 dshoukry@google.com<mailto:dshoukry@google.com> |

Received on Friday, 18 September 2020 14:24:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 18 September 2020 14:24:20 UTC