As a member of the W3C, I endorse the submission of NTI to the Linux
Foundation Decentralized Trust. NTI provides the critical runtime
enforcement layer the machine economy needs.
Daveed Benjamin
On Sun, 8 Nov 2026 17:15:18 +0530, Abisheak P < mailto:abisheakp197@gmail.com > wrote:
> Hi Larry, Alan, Paola, Kaliya, Chris, and the W3C members,
>
> I have just issued a final call to the Federation builders to stand with
> NTI.
>
> I want to be direct: We have reached the end of the technical review phase.
> Every time we asked for institutional support, we received requests for
> more spec reviews, more bug fixes, and more documentation. We listened to
> every single comment. The code is hardened, the DCO is enforced, the
> witness packages are reproducible, and the TSC represents three independent
> organizations (NTI, UIBC, VATE).
>
> The technical work is done. We are not opening another review cycle. We are
> submitting to the Linux Foundation Decentralized Trust (LFDT) this week.
>
> If you do not know what NTI is, here is the 1-minute summary: NTI is a
> post-quantum runtime enforcement sidecar. It proves exactly who authorized
> an AI agent's action and what the agent actually did. It is the missing
> Layer 1 enforcement for the identity and evidence layers you are all
> building.
>
> If you want to read the spec, here is the link:
> https://github.com/abisheakp197/nti-spec
> If you want to see the code, here it is:
> https://github.com/abisheakp197/Neutral-Trust-Infrastructure
>
> We are moving to the Linux Foundation to secure neutral hosting. This is
> the final call. We need your institutional weight behind us to guarantee
> this standard remains vendor-neutral.
>
> If you believe in this infrastructure and want your name on the
> institutional record, reply with exactly this sentence:
>
> "As a member of the W3C, I endorse the submission of NTI to the Linux
> Foundation Decentralized Trust. NTI provides the critical runtime
> enforcement layer the machine economy needs."
>
> If you endorse, I will add you to the LFDT proposal. If you choose to
> abstain, we will proceed with the endorsements we have and secure the
> future of the standard.
>
> No more bugs. No more arguments. Just endorse or abstain.
>
> Best,
> Abisheak