draft-li-rttp-iqa-addressing-02: posted, with the review on the record

Greetings all,
Revision -02 of draft-li-rttp-iqa-addressing, the specification of the rttp:// (Resonant Time Transfer Protocol, CRI 27) and iqa:// (Identity Quality Assurance, CRI 28) URI schemes, was posted on 1 November 2026 at 06:48 UTC, five days after -01. The datatracker listing shows 31 October: the submission server's own calendar. The grammar of both schemes, the derivation rules, and both wire formats are byte-stable; what the five days bought is semantics, receipts, and an acknowledgements section. The revision runs 40 pages against -01's 34.
What -02 adds, briefly: evaluation at the moment of use (Section 6.3), with the mid-task expiry case settled in Section 6.2; the argument that a legible refusal is what lets attenuation survive, now carried in the rationale of Section 8.1; race receipts in Section 8.2; a seat, not a vote, for policy interpreters (Section 8.4); a client-side no-lookup requirement (Section 4.5.4); one sentence in Section 7.2 that defers rather than asserts; and three additions to the related-work map in Section 12, including RFC 9315 as the concept root the schemes extend.
Section 14 records the review on the record, and it is listed here in full. Alan Karp — for three days of head-on public engagement: the credential-sharing argument now recorded in the rationale of Section 8.1; the observation that no deployed system carries the delegator's standing policy, the gap Section 12 names and deliberately leaves open; and the correction separating the moment a policy is expressed from the moment its condition is judged, adopted as the evaluation rule of Section 6.3.
Larry Lewis, chair of the W3C Agent Trust Protocol Community Group — for keeping the public examination of these schemes concrete and ordered; for the joint experiment that became the lease-revocation-axes family on which the response vocabulary of Section 8 was exercised; and for his independent reproduction of the runner, recorded in the laboratory's records beside the author's own runs.
Tymofii Pidlisnyi, maintainer of the Agent-Authority-Conformance laboratory of the Linux Foundation Decentralized Trust — for surfacing two reporting defects, both fixed in the corrected revision; for recording each independent run under its own authorship label; and for holding the frozen corpus on which every run in this family stands.
Lars Kersten Kroehl, author of the Agent Authorization Envelope — his observation that a refusal recorded only as permitted or refused makes an undetermined authority look like a decided one is the separation Section 8.1 fixes as a value of its own; his requirement that a recorded decision name the grant as it stood when it was made is the rule Section 8.2 codifies; and his refinement that one window opens per successful read is the sharper form of the fail-closed rules of Section 6.2.
Tetsuroh Hori — for a clean-room recomputation over the frozen vectors of the family, filed in the laboratory's records without any prior contact with the author.
Both schemes remain experimental and the document Informational. The revision, and the record of what changed and who asked, are at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-rttp-iqa-addressing/ A section-by-section reading of the additions, with each quotation verbatim from the primary text, has been published at: https://blog.aicent.com/q22-what-revision-two-adds/
Best regards,
Lee
lee@aicent.com
RTTP & IQA Organization
Author, draft-li-rttp-iqa-addressing
Resonant Time Transfer Protocol (RTTP, CRI 27)
Identity Quality Assurance (IQA, CRI 28)
Sites: https://rttp.com · https://iqa.org
Blog: https://blog.aicent.com