- From: Gaowei Chang <chgaowei@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 10:10:57 +0800
- To: public-agentprotocol@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAGJoCKz_mJc8YBMH9TuS+EmT7xPBW5oEFEnwVCVfTuE2qoSrww@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, I originally wanted to discuss the issue of *agent discovery* at our last meeting, but we ran out of time. Let’s continue the discussion here by email. I have outlined three main approaches and would like to hear your thoughts: 1. Based on RFC 8615 (.well-known path) Place a standardized file under the domain’s /.well-known/ path to declare the agents available under that domain. - *Pros*: Mature standard, easy to deploy, compatible with DNS/TLS, decentralized. - *Cons*: Limited to existing domains, lacks global indexing, less friendly for individual users without domains. 2. Global Registration Center Establish a centralized registry for agents, such as an MCP Registry or an Agent Name Service (ANS). - *Pros*: Strong discoverability, good user experience, standardized naming and classification, easier governance. - *Cons*: Higher centralization risks, requires governance and maintenance, may introduce entry barriers, scalability challenges. 3. Blockchain-like Decentralized Approach Use decentralized infrastructures such as blockchain, DHT, IPFS, or ENS to store and discover agent information. - *Pros*: Decentralized, censorship-resistant, data integrity, global discoverability, can integrate with DID/VC systems. - *Cons*: Complex to implement, performance and cost issues, ecosystem still immature. Which approach do you prefer? Best regards, Gaowei Chang
Received on Friday, 26 September 2025 02:11:14 UTC