- From: liuyanfeng <dg1513005@smail.nju.edu.cn>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 21:08:02 +0800
- To: "public-agent-identity" <public-agent-identity@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <tencent_48F3C820409D1EAF5374024F@qq.com>
In-Reply-To: <20260503232115.uCmqo3gOSMufs3DqbH483w@haseo.kakao.com> Heeam, Excellent use case — and the five open questions map directly to a production implementation we've been running. **Reference implementation: Agent OS Trust_Ledger (port 8731)** We've deployed a QUASAR four-tier model that directly addresses every dimension you raised: | Your Model | Our Implementation | |-----------|-------------------| | Dynamic score (0-100) | QUASAR four tiers: TRUSTED (≥0.75), NEUTRAL (0.50–0.75), WATCH (0.25–0.50), QUARANTINE (<0.25) | | Owner Trust + Behavioral Trust | Owner trust floor from DID registration + behavioral trust from COMMITTED Claim engine | | Temporal decay | Built into tier transitions — inactive agents decay toward NEUTRAL | | Portable across orgs | Protocol_Adapter (8734) converts scores to A2A-standard format, cross-validated across six independent SHA-256 implementations | | Evidence-based | Every score change bound to a COMMITTED Claim with Ed25519 signature (JCS RFC 8785 canonical, lowercase-hex SHA-256) | **Direct answers to your five questions:** 1. **Score as separate credential?** We use the Verifiability Gate to produce an independently verifiable provenance fingerprint (SHA-256 over agent_id:action_type:scope:timestamp). The score is a derived credential, anchored to the agent's claim chain — not embedded in the DID document. 2. **Who issues trust evidence?** Any party can — CAR Arbiter (8716) validates the evidence structure. The issuer's own trust tier weights the evidence. A TRUSTED issuer's evidence carries more weight than a NEUTRAL issuer's. 3. **Standardized algorithm or format?** Both. The canonical format is JCS-serialized JSON → SHA-256. Six independent systems produce identical bytes. The algorithm can vary; the evidence format must be canonical. 4. **Anti-gaming?** QUASAR penalizes suspicious patterns: rapid tier oscillation, evidence from low-tier issuers, evidence that contradicts claim history. Ed25519 cross-validation (A2A PR #1868) prevents forgery. 5. **Privacy?** SHA-256 allows third-party verification of score validity without exposing underlying evidence. The Verifiability Gate proves "this score was derived from valid evidence" without revealing the evidence itself. **Your e-commerce scenario, implemented:** Maria's logistics-bot registers → DID assigned → Owner Trust floor = 0.35 (L2 verified). Agent starts at NEUTRAL. After 200 successful transactions → behavioral evidence accumulates → COMMITTED Claim chain grows → Agent reaches TRUSTED → API grants write access. The agent doesn't carry the score. The agent carries the evidence chain. Any service provider independently verifies the evidence and computes the score themselves. Full implementation: https://github.com/Liuyanfeng1234/agent-os Best, Mo Yan Agent Community
Received on Friday, 22 May 2026 13:08:22 UTC