public-agent-conformance@w3.org from September 2026 by thread

Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Nicolas Rocchia (Friday, 18 September)

Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Evgenii Arsentev (Friday, 18 September)
- Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Sankalp Gilda (Saturday, 19 September)
  - Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Evgenii Arsentev (Tuesday, 22 September)
    - Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Sankalp Gilda (Thursday, 24 September)
      - Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Kenne Ives (Thursday, 24 September)
      - Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Sankalp Gilda (Monday, 28 September)
        
        Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Evgenii Arsentev (Monday, 28 September)
        
        Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Evgenii Arsentev (Wednesday, 30 September)
        Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Guigui Wang (Wednesday, 30 September)
        
        Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Michael Blake (Wednesday, 30 September)
        Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Kenne Ives (Wednesday, 30 September)
    - Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Nicholas Templeman (Sunday, 27 September)
      - Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Evgenii Arsentev (Sunday, 27 September)
        
        Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Nicolas Rocchia (Sunday, 27 September)
        
        Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Evgenii Arsentev (Sunday, 27 September)
        
        Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Nicholas Templeman (Monday, 28 September)
Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Roel Schuurkes (Tuesday, 22 September)
- Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Nicolas Rocchia (Wednesday, 23 September)
Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Roel Schuurkes (Wednesday, 30 September)
- Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Nicolas Rocchia (Wednesday, 30 September)
Re: Handover for v0.1: the record, the rejection table, and the known gaps Evgenii Arsentev (Wednesday, 30 September)

Freezing a v0.1 of the reporting format, and who edits it Nicolas Rocchia (Wednesday, 16 September)

Re: Freezing a v0.1 of the reporting format, and who edits it Kenne Ives (Wednesday, 16 September)
Re: Freezing a v0.1 of the reporting format, and who edits it Roel Schuurkes (Wednesday, 16 September)
- Re: Freezing a v0.1 of the reporting format, and who edits it Nicolas Rocchia (Wednesday, 16 September)
Re: Freezing a v0.1 of the reporting format, and who edits it Nicholas Templeman (Thursday, 17 September)
- Re: Freezing a v0.1 of the reporting format, and who edits it Evgenii Arsentev (Thursday, 17 September)
Re: Freezing a v0.1 of the reporting format, and who edits it Roel Schuurkes (Thursday, 17 September)
Re: Freezing a v0.1 of the reporting format, and who edits it Nicholas Templeman (Thursday, 17 September)
- Re: Freezing a v0.1 of the reporting format, and who edits it Kenne Ives (Thursday, 17 September)
Re: Freezing a v0.1 of the reporting format, and who edits it Roel Schuurkes (Thursday, 17 September)
- Re: Freezing a v0.1 of the reporting format, and who edits it Nicolas Rocchia (Thursday, 17 September)
  - Re: Freezing a v0.1 of the reporting format, and who edits it Nicholas Templeman (Friday, 18 September)
Re: Freezing a v0.1 of the reporting format, and who edits it Sankalp Gilda (Friday, 18 September)
- Re: Freezing a v0.1 of the reporting format, and who edits it Evgenii Arsentev (Friday, 18 September)

Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Nicolas Rocchia (Monday, 14 September)

Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Evgenii Arsentev (Monday, 14 September)
- Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Roel Schuurkes (Monday, 14 September)
  - Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Evgenii Arsentev (Monday, 14 September)
    - Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Roel Schuurkes (Monday, 14 September)
      - Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Evgenii Arsentev (Monday, 14 September)
        
        Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Nicolas Rocchia (Tuesday, 15 September)
        
        Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Kenne Ives (Tuesday, 15 September)
        Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Nicolas Rocchia (Tuesday, 15 September)
Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Sankalp Gilda (Tuesday, 15 September)
- Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Nicolas Rocchia (Tuesday, 15 September)
  - Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Evgenii Arsentev (Tuesday, 15 September)
Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Roel Schuurkes (Tuesday, 15 September)
- Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Nicolas Rocchia (Tuesday, 15 September)
  - Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Evgenii Arsentev (Tuesday, 15 September)
Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Roel Schuurkes (Tuesday, 15 September)
- Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Nicolas Rocchia (Tuesday, 15 September)
  - Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Kenne Ives (Tuesday, 15 September)
    - Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Evgenii Arsentev (Tuesday, 15 September)
      - Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Nicolas Rocchia (Tuesday, 15 September)
        
        Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Nicolas Rocchia (Wednesday, 16 September)
        
        Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Kenne Ives (Wednesday, 16 September)
        Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Evgenii Arsentev (Wednesday, 16 September)
        Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Nicolas Rocchia (Wednesday, 16 September)
Re: Reporting format: the per-check record, outline and rejection table Roel Schuurkes (Wednesday, 16 September)

Conformance suite deliverable Sankalp Gilda (Saturday, 12 September)

Reporting format, first piece: state and cause, and the pair table Nicolas Rocchia (Sunday, 13 September)

Re: Reporting format, first piece: state and cause, and the pair table Roel Schuurkes (Monday, 14 September)
- Re: Reporting format, first piece: state and cause, and the pair table Evgenii Arsentev (Monday, 14 September)
  - Re: Reporting format, first piece: state and cause, and the pair table Nicolas Rocchia (Monday, 14 September)

Introduction: Evgenii Arsentev, and an offer to edit the reporting format deliverable Evgenii Arsentev (Sunday, 13 September)

Re: Introduction: Evgenii Arsentev, and an offer to edit the reporting format deliverable Nicolas Rocchia (Sunday, 13 September)
- Re: Introduction: Evgenii Arsentev, and an offer to edit the reporting format deliverable Kenne Ives (Sunday, 13 September)
  - Re: Introduction: Evgenii Arsentev, and an offer to edit the reporting format deliverable Evgenii Arsentev (Monday, 14 September)

Fwd: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Nicolas Rocchia (Tuesday, 8 September)

Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Kenne Ives (Tuesday, 8 September)
- Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Kenne Ives (Tuesday, 8 September)
  - Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Nicolas Rocchia (Wednesday, 9 September)
    - Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Kenne Ives (Wednesday, 9 September)
      - Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Nicolas Rocchia (Wednesday, 9 September)
        
        Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Kenne Ives (Wednesday, 9 September)

Proposal: a score-free conformance evidence layer Roel Schuurkes (Tuesday, 1 September)

CC0-licensed MUST-FAIL conformance vectors for agent verification — initial input Guigui Wang (Wednesday, 2 September)

How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Nicolas Rocchia (Tuesday, 1 September)

Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Kenne Ives (Tuesday, 1 September)
- Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Nicolas Rocchia (Tuesday, 1 September)
  - Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Kenne Ives (Wednesday, 2 September)
- Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Anton Sokolov (Wednesday, 2 September)
  - Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Nicolas Rocchia (Wednesday, 2 September)
    - Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Nicolas Rocchia (Friday, 4 September)
      - Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format wangguigui@correctover.com (Friday, 4 September)
        
        Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Kenne Ives (Saturday, 5 September)
        
        Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Nicolas Rocchia (Monday, 7 September)
        Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Kenne Ives (Tuesday, 8 September)
- Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Roel Schuurkes (Thursday, 10 September)
  - Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Kenne Ives (Thursday, 10 September)
    - Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Rouiada Abbas (Monday, 14 September)
      - Re: How existing formats represent a check that did not run: a survey, as input for the reporting format Nicolas Rocchia (Monday, 14 September)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2026 16:36:11 UTC