Re: Review Request: Response to 422, 464 and 447

-1 on the proposed resolution for Issues #447 & #464

Proposed Alternative Response:

(Until such time as this proposed new requirement - Clear Words - has been
examined and discussed by the Working Group for usefulness and viability, I
personally see little value in ganging up 2 separate issues under one new
issue. I would prefer that after sitting on these issues for more than 14
months, that any response we now send out be substantive in nature.)


On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 3:11 PM Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael <
rmontgomery@loc.gov> wrote:

> Dear AG / Silver participant,
>
>
>
> The working group has created Pull Request (PR) 627
> <https://github.com/w3c/silver/pull/627/files> and drafted a response to
> address minor editorial changes in GitHub issues:
>
>    - WCAG3 public comment (Images of Text) #422
>    <https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/422>
>    - Email: Oracle feedback on WCAG 3.0 FPWD (3 - Clear Words #464)
>    <https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/464>
>    - Email: ITI Comments on First Public Working Draft of W3C
>    Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 3.0 (5 - Clear Words) #447
>    <https://github.com/w3c/silver/issues/447>
>
>
>
> Please review the response and associated PR. If you have an objection,
> please respond to this e-mail with your proposed alternative response or PR
> changes within the next 7 days.
>
>
>
> If there are no objections, the response and PR will be accepted and the
> issue will be closed.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Rachael
>
> ---
>
> Rachael Bradley Montgomery, PhD
>
> Digital Accessibility Specialist
>
> Library of Congress
>
> Email: rmontgomery@loc.gov
>


-- 
*John Foliot* |
Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility |
W3C Accessibility Standards Contributor |

"I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." -
Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"