Perhaps the use of test assertions could help clarify the outcomes. See: https://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/#write-assertion-gpand https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=tag
On Thursday, April 1, 2021, 10:19:57 AM EDT, Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> wrote:
Hey folks,
Here are the minutes to today's joint ACT & Silver meeting:
https://www.w3.org/2021/04/01-wcag-act-minutes.html
In summary, the group discussed where the ACT work might be able to fit in. Shadi brought up that WCAG 3 outcomes could be better defined in various ways. Anne Thyme Nørregaard suggested to see the ACT Rules Format as requirements needed by testers to be able to test consistently. Wilco Fiers mentioned that there is quite some overlap between ACT rules and WCAG 3 methods, and that figuring out a way to blend the two could be a good starting point for a joint effort.
Jeanne Spellman suggested to have a longer follow-up meeting to take one of the guidelines and work out in detail what improvements ACT would recommend be made to it. The ACT and Silver chairs will follow up to plan such a meeting.
Kind regards,
--
Wilco FiersAxe-core product owner - Facilitator ACT Task Force - Co-chair ACT-Rules
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2021 01:00:17 UTC