- From: Lionel Wolberger <lionel.wolberger@levelaccess.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 14:25:16 +0000
- To: Jason Taylor <jason@usablenet.com>, "Janina.sajka@gmail.com" <janina.sajka@gmail.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- CC: Accessibility at the Edge <public-a11yedge@w3.org>, Mike Paciello <michael.paciello@audioeye.com>, Chris Novell <chnovell@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <LV3PR22MB5870356E7A219B6F7524ACEA9501A@LV3PR22MB5870.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
This change OK with me From: Jason Taylor <jason@usablenet.com> Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 at 17:18 To: Janina.sajka@gmail.com <janina.sajka@gmail.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> Cc: Accessibility at the Edge <public-a11yedge@w3.org>, Lionel Wolberger <lionel@userway.org>, Mike Paciello <michael.paciello@audioeye.com>, Chris Novell <chnovell@gmail.com> Subject: Small edits IMPORTANT: Abstract Rewrite, Draft #2 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Janina I would suggest removing "Real-time" from the opening statements , as dynamic I feel is enough and when we say both it seems we are trying to "sell" or "Oversell" the value or approach. The less we try and over push the value and more drying explain the process the better. In that same vain I would use the phrase "improve the accessibility of web experiences", instead of "deliver accessible web experiences". So changing from: This document examines the trade-offs and benefits of dynamic accessibility remediations applied to web content in real-time to deliver accessible web experiences. To This document examines the trade-offs and benefits of dynamic accessibility remediations applied to web content to improve the accessibility of web experiences. - Regards ________________________________ From: Jason Taylor Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2025 1:14 PM To: Janina Sajka <janina@a11y.nyc> Cc: Accessibility at the Edge <public-a11yedge@w3.org>; Lionel Wolberger <lionel@userway.org>; Mike Paciello <michael.paciello@audioeye.com>; Chris Novell <chnovell@gmail.com> Subject: Re: IMPORTANT: Abstract Rewrite, Draft #2 Reads well. Effort appreciated This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee(s). It is confidential and contains legally privileged information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 30, 2025, at 12:30 PM, Janina Sajka <janina@a11y.nyc> wrote: Colleagues: Herewith yet another deep rewrite of our Abstract. I've taken from everyone's suggestions in this second draft. Please respond with any further guidance: https://a11yedge.github.io/capabilities/#abstract Best, Janina -- Janina Sajka (she/her/hers) Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa Linux Foundation Fellow https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2025 14:25:50 UTC