Re: Final Note on Terminology: simplify around ???Post-Source??? vs. post course and ???Edge???

Great news, Mike!

Latest version is always this Editor's Draft:

https://A11yEdge.github.io/capabilities/

Edits discussed yesterday should be there sometime late today or Friday
at the latest.

Mike Paciello writes:
> Janina -
> 
> AudioEye's CEO, David Moradi and I talked about supporting your suggestion
> of formally publicizing the Capabilities document. He's tentatively agreed
> to do that after an executive staff review of the finalized document. I
> believe we're 99% of the way there at this point. Can you send me a link to
> the most current version of the document? I'm not sure whether the one I'm
> looking at is the correct version.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mike
> 
> Mike Paciello
> Chief Accessibility Officer
> michael.paciello@audioeye.com
> +1.603.484.1938
> 
> [image: AudioEye Registered Trademark Logo]
> [image: Follow us on LinkedIn for more accessibility tips!]
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/audioeye-inc/>
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 1:54???PM Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote:
> 
> > Mike Paciello writes:
> > > Thanks Janina! I believe this brings greater clarity to the document.
> > >
> > Thanks, Mike! I had the same reaction as I was editing. I love the
> > several instances where we have the "source" and "post-source" pairing
> > in addressing content accessibility. Then, too, it makes use of "edge"
> > where aspirational services are discussed more meaningful because it's
> > more clearly something distinctive.
> >
> > I want to report, though, on my conversation with Chat GPT last
> > Saturday.
> >
> > I asked for a definition of "edge computing."
> >
> > Chat GPT returned with a definition focussing on processing proximate to
> > content sources.
> >
> > I then asked how that possibly benefits the user and was told all about
> > faster response and loading times.
> >
> > I then asked how that possibly could help people who require
> > personalization like different fonts or other screen characteristics.
> >
> > "Oh, very good point," said the AI. It continued to explain how user
> > devices would be the locus for that kind of processing.
> >
> > Lastly, I asked whether Chat GPT might want to reconsider its definition
> > of edge computing as a result of our conversation and recieved a
> > definition that, this time, did include user triggered modifications.
> >
> > I don't know whether that's now the canonical Chat GPT answer, but it
> > shows me that one can negotiate with the bots!
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Janina
> >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > Mike Paciello
> > > Chief Accessibility Officer
> > > michael.paciello@audioeye.com
> > > +1.603.484.1938
> > >
> > > [image: AudioEye Registered Trademark Logo]
> > > [image: Follow us on LinkedIn for more accessibility tips!]
> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/audioeye-inc/>
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 8:32???AM Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Colleagues:
> > > >
> > > > As Jason has long suggested, I've now taken a pass to exchange 'edge'
> > > > language for 'post-source' wherever it seemed meaningful. Specific
> > > > changes include:
> > > >
> > > > *       All 11 instances of "there's no particular benefit to
> > performing
> > > > *       this mediation at the edge" now say "to performing this
> > > > *       mediation post-source."
> > > >
> > > > *       Similarly modified our "not  a redundant capability" language
> > > > *       instances.
> > > >
> > > > I further made a significant number of edits by hand exchanging
> > > > 'post-source' where we previously had 'edge.' Hopefully, this now
> > > > clarifies according to our definition in Sec 1.2.
> > > >
> > > > https://A11yEdge.github.io/capabilities/#edgedef
> > > >
> > > > Looking forward to talking with you all on our long-delayed call
> > Wednesday!
> > > >
> > > > Janina
> > > >
> > > > Jason Taylor writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi team,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > As a final input, and as we are in the two-week period of edits, I
> > want
> > > > to strongly recommend we simplify and clarify our
> > terminology???especially
> > > > around the use of ???Edge??? in this document.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To be direct: what we???re describing as post-source remediation is
> > not
> > > > Edge technology. Nothing in the process occurs at the network edge.
> > > > Post-source solutions???whether overlays, widgets, or browser
> > plugins???run
> > > > client-side and retrieve updates from a third-party server. That???s
> > > > fundamentally different from true Edge mechanisms, which operate
> > within the
> > > > network layer itself to improve speed or enforce security policies
> > like bot
> > > > blocking. Nothing is ???done??? at the edge.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Using ???Edge??? invites unnecessary scrutiny and misinterpretation.
> > It
> > > > implies automation or infrastructure-level integration that simply
> > > > doesn???t exist here. More importantly, it undercuts the important
> > > > narrative we???ve built???that post-source requires deliberate and
> > > > considered approaches, well-engineered systems, and skilled developers
> > to
> > > > deliver real accessibility outcomes.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To avoid opening ourselves up to technical challenges or appearing to
> > > > overstate the capability, I recommend we remove all references to Edge
> > and
> > > > consistently use ???post-source??? instead.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks???I hope you understand I have the success of the document in
> > > > mind.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Jason
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are intended only to be
> > > > read or used by the named addressee(s). It is confidential and contains
> > > > legally privileged information. If you have received this message in
> > error,
> > > > please notify the sender immediately and delete this message.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my iPhone
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
> > > > Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka
> > > >
> > > > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> > > > Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures
> > http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
> > > >
> > > > Linux Foundation Fellow
> > > > https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > The information in this communication is intended for the use of the
> > > individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
> > information
> > > that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL and/or exempt from disclosure under
> > law.
> > > If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> > > dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
> > > prohibited.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
> > Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka
> >
> > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> > Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures     http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
> >
> > Linux Foundation Fellow
> > https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/
> >
> >
> 
> -- 
> The information in this communication is intended for the use of the 
> individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
> that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL and/or exempt from disclosure under law. 
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
> prohibited.

-- 

Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures	http://www.w3.org/wai/apa

Linux Foundation Fellow
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/

Received on Thursday, 29 May 2025 18:26:02 UTC