Re: TWO WEEK LAST CALL: Regularizing Port Numbers for SSL. from Mark Shuttleworth on 1997-02-06 (ietf-tls@w3.org from January to March 1997)

From: Mark Shuttleworth <marks@thawte.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 21:49:48 +0200 (SAT)
To: Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
cc: Christian Kuhtz <chk@gnu.ai.mit.edu>, Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@consensus.com>, Tim Hudson <tjh@mincom.com>, ietf-tls@w3.org, ssl-talk@netscape.com
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95q.970206214829.111A-100000@bilbo.thawte.com>

> 
> ftps        990/tcp            # ftp protocol over TLS/SSL
> simap       991/tcp            # imap4 protocol over TLS/SSL
> logins      992/tcp            # login protocol over TLS/SSL
> shells      993/tcp            # shell protocol over TLS/SSL
> telnets     994/tcp            # telnet protocol over TLS/SSL
> gophers     995/tcp            # gopher protocol over TLS/SSL
> ircs        996/tcp            # irc protocol over TLS/SSL
> sockss     1081/tcp            # socks protocol over TLS/SSL

Fair enough.  Chris - could all of the above go into the >1024 range?

--
Mark Shuttleworth
Thawte Consulting

Received on Thursday, 6 February 1997 14:53:05 UTC