- From: Tom Weinstein <tomw@netscape.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 10:27:33 -0800
- To: dennis.glatting@plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us
- CC: Eric Young <eay@mincom.com>, Christian Kuhtz <chk@gnu.ai.mit.edu>, Mark Shuttleworth <marks@thawte.com>, Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@consensus.com>, Tim Hudson <tjh@mincom.com>, ietf-tls@w3.org, ssl-talk@netscape.com
Dennis Glatting wrote: > > True, but... > > W&S recommend the SSL HMAC be upgraded to the most recent > construction and draft-ietf-tls-ssl-mods-00.txt proposes > the upgrade. If adopted there will be a compatibility issue. Yes, and that's why the version number must be rev'ed when those changes are integrated. I understand that the editors are working hard on this and will hopefully have something out soon. -- You should only break rules of style if you can | Tom Weinstein coherently explain what you gain by so doing. | tomw@netscape.com
Received on Thursday, 6 February 1997 13:57:18 UTC