- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 16:50:57 -0500
- To: david.brownell@eng.sun.com (David Brownell - JavaSoft)
- Cc: ietf-tls@w3.org
Dave and all, At 09:43 AM 10/21/96 -0700, you wrote: >> 1) Try to come to closure on an updated/fixed specification >> of SSLv3.0 for the standards track, with no major >> changes > >I'd like to see this happen. At the very least, the existing >RFC should get updated with the clarifications which I know all >implementors have contributed (including the list of errata), >and then recirculated. I agree here whole hartedly. I think this should be a primary goal. > >This of course leaves open the issue of "who does it". I will >gladly help review, applying my experience as an implementor. >No time to help write before the San Jose meeting, though. Well, Dave, I am offering my services and experiance if it is needed. > > >> 1. If we pursued option #1, and then never did anything else, >> would the WG have been successful? > >Based on some recent discussions in other parts of the IETF, >yes. New WGs could be set up to do later work. I think that new WG's is a good idea, coordination may be a problem, but managable. I would be gad to participate and off er my implimentation experiance here. This could get the agressive schedual met possibly as well. > > >> 3. Is it better now to advance the state of the art, given that we >> have some user requirements, or simply to codify the current use? > >SSL v3.0 _does_ advance the state of the art, and it does >address the requirements of numerous users. > >If do our best to ensure that it can later be compatibily >extended (done already, yes?) then we can later advance the >state of the art by bringing additional users under our Big Top >later on, e.g. by supporting shared key authentication via >GSS-API handshaking. I suspect attribute certs may be more of >a PKI issue than a TLS issue. I am not sure I agree that attribute certs is more of an PKI issue than a TLS issue. Shared athentication should also be addressed as it is intragle in my opinion. Reguards, > >- Dave > > > Jeffrey A. Williams SR.Internet Network Eng. CEO., IEG., INC., Representing PDS .Ltd. Web: http://www.pds-link.com Phone: 214-793-7445 (Direct Line) Director of Network Eng. and Development IEG. INC.
Received on Monday, 21 October 1996 18:16:00 UTC