- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 17:36:56 -0500
- To: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@consensus.com>
- Cc: ietf-tls@w3.org
All, I agree with what Christopher suggests. I would like to see a refrence in both documents to one another however. Reguards, At 02:27 PM 10/16/96 -0700, you wrote: >At 12:48 PM -0700 10/16/96, David P. Kemp wrote: >>There appears to be consensus for having separate specification documents, >>one describing the Record Layer, the other describing the various messages >>that ride on top of it. Several people have declared support for a modular >>document structure, none have opposed it. Anyone opposed should speak up now. > >I'm not opposed to this, as long as the existing authors and the group that >can meet in early November to clarify the spec feel that they can also fit >in the task of splitting the spec into the schedule as well. > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ >..Christopher Allen Consensus Development Corporation.. >..<ChristopherA@consensus.com> 1563 Solano Avenue #355.. >.. Berkeley, CA 94707-2116.. >..Home of "SSL Plus: o510/559-1500 f510/559-1505.. >.. SSL 3.0 Integration Suite(tm)" <http://www.consensus.com/SSLPlus/>.. > > > > Jeffrey A. Williams SR.Internet Network Eng. CEO., IEG., INC., Representing PDS .Ltd. Web: http://www.pds-link.com Phone: 214-793-7445 (Direct Line) Director of Network Eng. and Development IEG. INC.
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 1996 19:01:19 UTC