- From: Arthur S. Hitomi <ahitomi@zola.ics.uci.edu>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 14:31:53 -0800
- To: ejw@ics.uci.edu
- cc: SWAP LIST <ietf-swap@w3.org>
Jim, Surendra has requested to post the meeting minutes. I'm sure they'll be up shortly. Art In message <000701be29f5$031840c0$3a4f37a6@galileo>, Jim Whitehead writes: >So, where are the minutes? It's now several days later. If you need the >raw minutes, Rohit and I could send them to you again. > >My apologies if you have just sent out the minutes -- I'm working mostly >offline today. > >- Jim > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ietf-swap-request@w3.org [mailto:ietf-swap-request@w3.org]On >> Behalf Of Arthur S. Hitomi >> Sent: Monday, December 14, 1998 11:00 PM >> To: Larry Masinter >> Cc: Richard Heim; SWAP LIST >> Subject: Re: HELP with Method Name in SWAP headers >> >> >> Larry, I'll post the minutes of SWAP tomorrow. >> >> >> Art >> >> In message >> <000d01be27cb$a07f6360$aa66010d@copper.parc.xerox.com>, Larry Masinte >> r writes: >> >> Am I to understand that the idea of placing these methods into the >> >> header is NOT settled - and that I can implement this NOW any >> way I want? >> > >> >Until there is a standard, there is no standard. >> > >> >You can always implement things NOW however you want. The only question >> >is whether you will find the resulting interoperability satisfactory. >> > >> >Has anyone reported the minutes from the SWAP meeting at the last IETF? >> >I couldn't make it (a conflict with another WG which I couldn't miss), >> >but the report I heard didn't make it sound like good news. >> > >> >> I'd hate to write it one way now just to change it later - but I >> >> need to get something going now! >> > >> >The price of early adoption is the likelihood of having to change things. >> > >> > >> >Larry >> > >> >
Received on Thursday, 17 December 1998 17:36:17 UTC