- From: Charles Eckel via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:13:41 -0700
- To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-unencoded-digest@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, mnot@mnot.net
Charles Eckel has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-httpbis-unencoded-digest-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-unencoded-digest/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for this clear and concise document. In section 6, one minor suggestion is to update the description of the response in the second example. OLD The server responds with a 206 (Partial Content) response using GZIP content coding, it has three different Integrity fields. NEW The server responds with a 206 (Partial Content) response using GZIP content coding and containing three different Integrity fields.
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2026 22:14:34 UTC