Re: [Green] New Draft: The Sustainability Well-Know URI

Yes, I think having the basic/extended capabilities and schema versioning
would allow any further improvements (even after/if becomes a standard).

Thank you,
Andrei.


On Sat, Mar 21, 2026, 22:13 Michael Sweet <msweet=
40msweet.org@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Andrei,
>
> > On Mar 21, 2026, at 12:02 PM, Andrei Besleaga <andrei.besleaga=
> 40ieee.org@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Michael,
> >
> > About the Quarterly I removed it since I thought would be better for the
> standard to cover "normal dates" (from the RFC datetime format and easier
> for implementing technically in some universal SQL/NoSQL formats).
> >
> > Also was thinking if there is already a yearly query param period (with
> monthly granularity),  and is in recommendations to have the yearly stuff
> cached, then maybe this would suffice to have only yearly, monthly, daily
> (with monthly/daily granularity), would cover all cases (up to a year), and
> optimized enough for same further queries (and if an auditor would want a
> larger period than monthly or some days, they probably would want longer
> periods, they would derive easily from 12 months result, the 4 quarters).
>
> That will probably be sufficient, but we can always extend things later as
> needed...
>
> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
>
>