- From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
- Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:54:34 +1100
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Fri, Feb 6, 2026, at 06:58, Lucas Pardue wrote: > Alex beat me to what I was going to say here. The proposed text could > be wordsmithed more I guess. Still not convinced this is a huge spec > problem though (the protocol-level requirements are correct IMO, just > maybe not super obvious on first inspection but what is?) You are both right, of course. This did seem editorial, but the 2xx/200 question below might tip that further toward being technical. Is it 2xx that has no response body, or is it only 200? I don't know if we ever really decided that. > A CONNECT request consists of a header block only and cannot contain a body or trailers; similarly, a 200 response to a CONNECT requests consists of a header block only. Other responses to a CONNECT request are normal HTTP responses and can contain a body (that can explain why a request failed, for example).
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2026 23:54:59 UTC