- From: David Benjamin <davidben@chromium.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2026 12:39:34 -0500
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 18 January 2026 17:39:51 UTC
Wouldn't such an intermediary also be able to poison a cache by sending other caching headers wrong or the wrong content? I think that's just generally part of the threat model for caches and intermediaries, unless I'm missing something here On Sun, Jan 18, 2026, 11:07 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Am 30.09.2025 um 05:20 schrieb Tommy Pauly: > > Hello HTTP, > > > > This email starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-no- > > vary-search-03. > > ... > > Can an intermediary cause cache poisoning in the recipients by marking > additional parameters as irrelevant? > > Best regards, Julian > >
Received on Sunday, 18 January 2026 17:39:51 UTC