Re: Pre-Denied: Status Code (#3410)

Using 419 sounds fair, if they don't have an RFC...

On Fri, Apr 3, 2026 at 2:49 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> I'll be more specific.
>
> Does anyone see a reason not to use 419?
>
> I'd argue that if we allow a single framework to squat on a code
> successfully, we're going to be running out of codes very very soon.
>
> Cheers,