- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 17:34:01 +1100
- To: Yusuf Motiwala <yusuf@mesibo.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Hello Yusuf, multipart/form-data is not specific to HTTP, so I'd suggest you take this to DISPATCH: https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/dispatch Since the main consumer of that media type is HTML, you might also consider checking with the WHATWG community: https://participate.whatwg.org/ Cheers, > On 29 Dec 2025, at 5:09 pm, Yusuf Motiwala <yusuf@mesibo.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > I am following up on my earlier message regarding > draft-motiwala-consolidated-multipart-params-00, sent a few weeks ago. > I wanted to check whether the Working Group would like to proceed with a discussion or an adoption call, or if there is a different procedure I > should follow at this stage. > Any guidance would be appreciated. > Thanks, > Yusuf > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 7:57 PM Yusuf Motiwala <yusuf@mesibo.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to request Working Group consideration of > draft-motiwala-consolidated-multipart-params-00: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-motiwala-consolidated-multipart-params/ > > The draft describes an efficiency pattern for multipart/form-data > uploads where multiple text parameters are combined into a single > application/x-www-form-urlencoded part. This reduces the parameter > overhead by 45–60% in production deployments while remaining fully > compatible with RFC 7578. > > Key properties: > - Uses only existing, standardized media types > - Requires no protocol changes or extensions > - Fully backward compatible (non-aware servers treat it as standard form data) > - Deployed in production for over two years, with high-volume uploads > > RFC 7578 defines multipart/form-data but does not address efficiency > considerations for parameter-heavy forms. This document fills that gap > by specifying a standards-compliant pattern already permitted by MIME > and HTTP. > > I believe this fits within the HTTPBIS scope, and I am willing to > continue as editor. Feedback and comments are welcome. > > Thanks, > Yusuf Motiwala > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 29 December 2025 06:34:12 UTC