- From: Julian Reschke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
- Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2025 09:24:16 -0800
- To: <art@ietf.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-incremental.all@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, last-call@ietf.org
Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-incremental Title: Incremental Forwarding of HTTP Messages Reviewer: Julian Reschke Review result: Ready with Nits Ready with minor nits. In 3., two documents about "extended CONNECT" are mentioned. Both are about WebSockets. Would it make sense sayint it here, potentially sparing readers the indirection? 4.3: it's (to me) not complely clear what is recommended. Set limits on bytes or time? The subsequent sentence indicates that this would be a problem as well. IANA: maybe link to the HTTP Proxy Error Types registry - that would make it easier to check the requirements.
Received on Saturday, 6 December 2025 17:24:20 UTC