- From: Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 10:46:55 -0500
- To: Steven Bingler <bingler@chromium.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis.all@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, last-call@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org
Steven Bingler <bingler@chromium.org> writes: > Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 12:09:33 -0400 My apologies for not responding sooner. All of my concerns have been addressed. In theory, I'd like to see the character-set issues handled according to a more consistent theory, but we need to be upward-compatible with reality, and that makes theoretical consistency impossible. > You can find all the changes in the latest draft, > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis, > plus a recent small commit: > https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/59f5e21e84e19ba81eae5484a22a2ed8dec9f445 The latest changes do improve a number of points. I only comment on an oddity: the version at https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/blob/main/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis.md does not have the section numbers, which can make it hard to track references to e.g. "section 4.1.1". Dale
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2025 15:47:03 UTC