Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-incremental-02.txt

• From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
• Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 20:46:28 +1100
• To: "Rahul Gupta" <cxres@protonmail.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <a4801eaf-5260-4af0-b0dd-81d85fd3e71c@betaapp.fastmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 22, 2025, at 18:14, Rahul Gupta wrote:
> "This document does not define any parameters for the Incremental 
> header field value, but future documents might define parameters. 
> Receivers MUST ignore unknown parameters."
>
> should you not be defining an Incremental parameters registry in this 
> draft as well?

Not necessarily.  A registry makes it easier to add new parameters, but it is still possible to add parameters by updating the RFC.

Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2025 09:46:52 UTC