- From: Mohamed Boucadair via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 22:51:09 -0700
- To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Cc: httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Mohamed Boucadair has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-httpbis-08-02: Block When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-httpbis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- BLOCK: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi all, I have a point inherited from my previous ballot which I think should be clarified. # "minor" vs "major" It is not clear to me how these are characterized. New version is an example of major revision but that case is called separately and is definitely out of scope. Adding some few words to clarify what is "minor" vs "major" extension would clarify the scope. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # What is meant by "HTTP drafts" here? CURRENT: The Working Group may make minor revisions to the core HTTP drafts under the same criteria Cheers, Med
Received on Friday, 3 October 2025 05:51:14 UTC