Hi Ben,
Looks good to me. Thank you.
Cheers,
Med
De : Ben Schwartz <bemasc=40meta.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Envoyé : mercredi 10 septembre 2025 16:51
À : The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Cc : draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade@ietf.org; httpbis-chairs@ietf.org; ietf-http-wg@w3.org; tpauly@apple.com
Objet : Re: Mohamed Boucadair's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade-05: (with COMMENT)
Hi Med,
I've incorporated these suggestions: see https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/97852dca45e2b2d297c35707d5f96ca7b0367d41.
> CURRENT:
> Future specifications for upgrade tokens should account for the
> security issues discussed here and provide clear guidance on how
> implementations can avoid them.
> How this reco will be tracked?
I think the existence of this RFC ought to be sufficient to remind HTTPBIS and HTTPDIR to consider this question during their reviews.
--Ben
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.