- From: Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 12:12:52 -0700
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
- Message-ID: <CAFvDQ9pEfgdSefw9dojLvW4BgS-OqM-R7v0+owimy05--vG81g@mail.gmail.com>
Which IETF working group look into W3? Hesham On Mon, Jul 7, 2025, 10:14 AM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Our Area Director noticed that our charter is woefully out of date, and > suggested we think about rechartering. After a bit of discussion between > the chairs and AD, this is what we're currently suggesting: > > ~~~ > ## HTTP Working Group Charter > > This Working Group is charged with maintaining and developing the core > specifications for HTTP and generic extensions to it (i.e., those that are > not specific to one application). > > Beyond specification work, the Working Group is a forum for implementers, > practitioners, and researchers to discuss the protocol, its operation and > evolution, to improve interoperability and ecosystem health. However, the > chairs may ask that some discussions be moved off-list to avoid interfering > with specification work. > > ### Work Mode > > The Working Group may define extensions and other documents related to > HTTP as work items, provided that: > > * They are generic; i.e., not specific to one application using HTTP. Note > that Web browsing by definition is a generic use; > > * The Working Group Chairs judge that there is consensus to take on the > item; and > > * The Area Director is informed of the addition. > > Work that may need substantial input from other areas (e.g., Security) > should be coordinated through the appropriate bodies (such as the > responsible Area Director or a general / 'dispatch' group). > > ~~~ > > Please take a look and share your thoughts. We'll reserve some time for > discussion in Madrid. > > Cheers, > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > >
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2025 06:22:03 UTC