Thursday, 27 February 2025
Wednesday, 26 February 2025
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03.txt> (HTTP Cache Groups) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [IANA #1412905] expert review for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups (http-fields)
Tuesday, 25 February 2025
- Re: Client Hints Reliability Drafts
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Client Hints Reliability Drafts
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03
- Re: Client Hints Reliability Drafts
- Client Hints Reliability Drafts
- Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03
- Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03
- Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03
Monday, 24 February 2025
Tuesday, 25 February 2025
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-08.txt
- Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03
- Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03
Monday, 24 February 2025
- Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis - preliminary questions for IETF dnsdir review
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- [IANA #1412905] expert review for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups (http-fields)
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: Delete-Cookie header??
Thursday, 20 February 2025
- Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT)
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT)
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- DRAFT agenda for IETF 122 Bangkok
- John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT)
Wednesday, 19 February 2025
- New Draft: Forward and Reverse HTTP/3 over WebTransport
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- Re: _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
- _HttpOnly cookie prefix?
Tuesday, 18 February 2025
- Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT)
- Re: Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19
Monday, 17 February 2025
- Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT)
- Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT)
- Dnsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19
- Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Saturday, 15 February 2025
- Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19
- Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03
- Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis - preliminary questions for IETF dnsdir review
Friday, 14 February 2025
- RFC 9729 on The Concealed HTTP Authentication Scheme
- Re: Interoperability concern around :authority in RFC9113
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03.txt> (HTTP Cache Groups) to Proposed Standard
- [IANA #1412905] expert review for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups (http-fields)
Thursday, 13 February 2025
- Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT)
- Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03
- Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19: (with COMMENT)
Wednesday, 12 February 2025
Tuesday, 11 February 2025
- Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-03.txt
- Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19
Monday, 10 February 2025
Friday, 7 February 2025
Thursday, 6 February 2025
- [Errata Verified] RFC9112 (8284)
- [Errata Verified] RFC9110 (8268)
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9112 (8284)
- [Errata Verified] RFC9530 (8273)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8268)
Wednesday, 5 February 2025
- Re: Request to register 2 new HTTP field names
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Identifying versions in draft-toomim-httpbis-versions , was: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning)
- Re: Request to register 2 new HTTP field names
- Re: Request to register 2 new HTTP field names
- Re: Request to register 2 new HTTP field names
- Re: Request to register 2 new HTTP field names
Tuesday, 4 February 2025
- Re: Request to register 2 new HTTP field names
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: Request to register 2 new HTTP field names
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Request to register 2 new HTTP field names
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
Monday, 3 February 2025
Sunday, 2 February 2025
Saturday, 1 February 2025
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
Friday, 31 January 2025
Thursday, 30 January 2025
- Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9530 (8273)
- Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Httpdir last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-browser-based-apps-22
- Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
Wednesday, 29 January 2025
- Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
- Re: Response for unsupported conditional request
Tuesday, 28 January 2025
- Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19.txt> (Cookies: HTTP State Management Mechanism) to Proposed Standard
- Open errata on RFC 6265
- AD Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8268)
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8268)
Monday, 27 January 2025
Saturday, 25 January 2025
Thursday, 23 January 2025
Tuesday, 21 January 2025
Monday, 20 January 2025
Wednesday, 15 January 2025
- Re: HATEOAS on demand
- Re: HATEOAS on demand
- Re: HATEOAS on demand
- Re: HATEOAS on demand
- Re: HATEOAS on demand
- Re: HATEOAS on demand
- Re: HATEOAS on demand
- Re: HATEOAS on demand
Tuesday, 14 January 2025
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8441 (8250)
- HATEOAS on demand
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8441 (8250)
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8441 (8250)
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8441 (8250)
Monday, 13 January 2025
Sunday, 12 January 2025
Saturday, 11 January 2025
- Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types
- Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types
- Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types
- Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types
- Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types
- Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types
- Re: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types
- Re: About bcp47
Friday, 10 January 2025
- Re: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types
- About bcp47
- Re: [media-types] Re: Rethinking Media Types
- Re: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types
- Re: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types
Thursday, 9 January 2025
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-wrap-up-00.txt
- Re: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types
- Re: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types
- Re: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types
- RE: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types
- RE: [media-types] Rethinking Media Types
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-schinazi-httpbis-wrap-up
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-wrap-up-00.txt
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-wrap-up-00.txt
Wednesday, 8 January 2025
- Re: Call for Adoption: draft-schinazi-httpbis-wrap-up
- RE: POST+Upgrade, or unexpected limitation of RFC8441
- httpbis - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 122
Tuesday, 7 January 2025
- Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-19.txt
- Rethinking Media Types
Monday, 6 January 2025
- Re: [Wish] Re: How to discover a WHEP URL
- Re: [Wish] Re: How to discover a WHEP URL
- Re: How to discover a WHEP URL