Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-10

Am 18.05.2025 um 14:13 schrieb Rahul Gupta:
>
> Unless I am misunderstanding the context, I was pointing out the repetition between para 2 and 7, which still remains. Now, with the change, the two statements are inconsistent about String and Token.
> 
> Now that I am reading it again, I feel paragraph 2 can be rephrased to be more clear: "... containing the media range value without parameters. Parameters, if any, are mapped to Parameters of type String." The impression it created (when I was not reading carefully) is that media ranges value are without parameters, and then immediately later it can have parameters. I had to reread the text a few times to understand!
> ...

-> https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/3103

I also tried to clarify the difference between media type parameters and 
SF parameters.

> ...
> Maybe you can say something to the effect of "The Content-Length and Accept-Query (except in A.3) fields have been omitted for brevity".
> ...

On 2. thought, no. Accept-Query is truly optional, so that statement 
really would be misleading.

Best regards and thanks for the feedback,

Julian

Received on Monday, 19 May 2025 10:31:10 UTC