Re: [EXTERNAL] Proposal adaptation request

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 6:09 AM Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
> This discussion is simultaneously hilarious and horrifying, but by all means go ahead and store an extensible list of layered encoding names as an enumerated union type singleton because you are afraid of receiving traffic tickets for a valid but unregistered known content-coding named "_" that might be misinterpreted as an unknown content-coding within a PerformanceResourceTiming API that has no need for this information anyway.

This is certainly valid criticism on a number of grounds, but
copypasta continues to be a fairly prominent API "design" technique,
so we might as well set the right example. I've suggested "@unknown"
as @ is not part of tchar. (Seph's type is certainly neater, but this
is JavaScript.)


> I've got plenty of popcorn.

Please share some at the next meeting. 😊

Received on Thursday, 15 May 2025 11:36:58 UTC