- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 17:35:36 +1000
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Johann Hofmann <johannhof@google.com>
Based on the on-list and in-meeting discussions, the chairs believe there is consensus to adopt this document. Anne and Johann, please copy your draft to the httpwg/http-extensions repo and submit a draft-ietf-httpbis-*-00 draft; '*' might be 'cookies-again', 'cookies-deconstructed', or something else that distinguishes this effort from the long list of cookie revisions we've embarked upon. Please keep the draft synchronised with the 6265bis document as it is revised by the RFC Editor. Cheers, > On 19 Apr 2025, at 8:05 am, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > Everyone, > > This is a Call for Adoption of the following document: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-annevk-johannhof-httpbis-cookies-01.html > > This is a further revision of the Cookie specification, based upon rfc6265bis, which has been approved by the IESG. It's expected that the final RFC from that process will contain a few changes suggested by the IESG's review as well as the RFC Editor; these will be back ported to the draft if we adopt it. > > See a diff from the current 6265bis here: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis&doc_2=draft-annevk-johannhof-httpbis-cookies > > We have discussed this document a few times: > https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf120/minutes.html#revising-cookies-again > https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf120/future-cookies.pdf > https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf122/minutes.html#cookies-http-state-management-mechanism > > As in past revisions of this specification, adding any significant new features will require a separate specification, for which we'll issue a separate Call for Adoption. > > As a reminder, adopting a document does not imply consensus on its contents; issues can and will be raised to change it. We are agreeing on a starting point for our work. > > Please state whether or not you support adoption in response to this e-mail. If you do not support adoption, explaining your reasoning would help us evaluate consensus. > > This call will end on 2 May 2025. > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2025 07:35:47 UTC