- From: Mike Taylor <miketaylr@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 12:40:18 -0400
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
I am excited for the work of rfc6265bis to be formally done, and am supportive of the group adopting this draft as a continuation effort. On 4/18/25 6:05 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Everyone, > > This is a Call for Adoption of the following document: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-annevk-johannhof-httpbis-cookies-01.html > > This is a further revision of the Cookie specification, based upon rfc6265bis, which has been approved by the IESG. It's expected that the final RFC from that process will contain a few changes suggested by the IESG's review as well as the RFC Editor; these will be back ported to the draft if we adopt it. > > See a diff from the current 6265bis here: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis&doc_2=draft-annevk-johannhof-httpbis-cookies > > We have discussed this document a few times: > https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf120/minutes.html#revising-cookies-again > https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf120/future-cookies.pdf > https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf122/minutes.html#cookies-http-state-management-mechanism > > As in past revisions of this specification, adding any significant new features will require a separate specification, for which we'll issue a separate Call for Adoption. > > As a reminder, adopting a document does not imply consensus on its contents; issues can and will be raised to change it. We are agreeing on a starting point for our work. > > Please state whether or not you support adoption in response to this e-mail. If you do not support adoption, explaining your reasoning would help us evaluate consensus. > > This call will end on 2 May 2025. > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > >
Received on Saturday, 19 April 2025 16:40:24 UTC