- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 07:25:11 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 07.04.2025 16:39, Martin Thomson wrote: > On Sat, Apr 5, 2025, at 14:52, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-subscription-upgrade/ >> >> I reviewed the draft, and I have doubts that this protocol extension is >> needed at all (and therefore, the new preferences). (Feedback from >> *this* WG appreciated) > > I agree with Julian here. A resource can produce delta updates based on an understanding of the content that a client has (signaled through ETag). There are some somewhat interesting caching implications, but I understand that this protocol probably doesn't need to produce something that is fully cached up to the extent that might work. The caching implications are the same as with the proposal in the draft (relying on Vary). Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2025 05:25:17 UTC