- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 14:52:45 +0200
- To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
- Cc: calsify@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Am 02.04.2025 um 22:25 schrieb David Dong via RT: > Dear Julian Reschke (cc: calext WG), > > As the designated expert for the HTTP Preferences registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-calext-subscription-upgrade-13 for us? Please see > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-calext-subscription-upgrade/ > > The due date is April 16th. > > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll make the registration at: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-parameters/ > > We will assume that your response is a consensus response, unless you tell us otherwise. > > With thanks, > > David Dong > IANA Services Sr. Specialist David, I reviewed the draft, and I have doubts that this protocol extension is needed at all (and therefore, the new preferences). (Feedback from *this* WG appreciated) See <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/calsify/_CnkP8Ys5oIK1L-uCETwPFYV2lM/>. Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 5 April 2025 12:52:54 UTC