ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2024 by date

Thursday, 31 October 2024

• Delete-Cookie header?? Yoav Weiss

Wednesday, 30 October 2024

• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt David Schinazi
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Ted Hardie
• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-02 Mark Nottingham
• draft-toomim-httpbis-versions HTTP mapping (and WebDAV Versioning) Julian Reschke
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt Julian Reschke
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt Michael Toomim

Tuesday, 29 October 2024

• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Stephen Farrell
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt David Schinazi
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Stephen Farrell
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Watson Ladd
• [Errata Rejected] RFC9110 (8138) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Verified] RFC9421 (8102) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Verified] RFC9421 (8103) RFC Errata System
• [Errata Verified] RFC9530 (8158) RFC Errata System
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt Julian Reschke
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-02.txt Michael Toomim
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Stephen Farrell
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt David Schinazi

Monday, 28 October 2024

• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Stephen Farrell
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Dustin Mitchell

Saturday, 26 October 2024

• Httpdir last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis-07 Lucas Pardue via Datatracker
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Ted Hardie

Friday, 25 October 2024

• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt David Schinazi
• Re: Please review HTTP performance aspects of Incremental Font Transfer Chris Lilley
• Re: How big can the protocol elements in HTTP be? Michael Sweet
• Re: How big can the protocol elements in HTTP be? Willy Tarreau
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Ted Hardie
• How big can the protocol elements in HTTP be? Martin Thomson
• Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9530 (8158) Roberto Polli

Thursday, 24 October 2024

• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Ben Schwartz
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt David Schinazi
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt David Schinazi
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Rory Hewitt
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt David Schinazi
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Rory Hewitt
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Ben Schwartz
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Tommy Pauly
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Nick Doty
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Ted Hardie
• [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9530 (8158) RFC Errata System

Wednesday, 23 October 2024

• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt David Schinazi
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-connect-tcp-06.txt David Schinazi
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-connect-tcp-06.txt Ben Schwartz
• Re: WRAP_UP Capsule Kazuho Oku
• DRAFT agenda for IETF 121, Dublin Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 22 October 2024

• Re: Possible need for new 3xx status code Temporarily See Other Belov, Charles
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-connect-tcp-06.txt David Schinazi
• Re: WRAP_UP Capsule Lucas Pardue
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-05.txt Marius Kleidl
• Re: WRAP_UP Capsule David Schinazi
• Re: WRAP_UP Capsule Ben Schwartz
• Re: WRAP_UP Capsule David Schinazi
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8154) Justin Richer
• Re: WRAP_UP Capsule Ben Schwartz
• Re: WRAP_UP Capsule David Schinazi
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade-01.txt Ben Schwartz
• Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-connect-tcp-06.txt Ben Schwartz
• Re: WRAP_UP Capsule Ben Schwartz
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8154) RFC Errata System
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Ben Schwartz

Sunday, 20 October 2024

• Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-02 Wim Leers

Tuesday, 22 October 2024

• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Ted Hardie
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Ted Hardie
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Stephen Farrell
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Watson Ladd

Monday, 21 October 2024

• Re: [Webtransport] [Masque] Endpoint requirements for unknown Capsules Lucas Pardue
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-joshco-symmetric-h2-01.txt Josh Cohen
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-optimistic-upgrade-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-connect-tcp-06.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-resumable-upload-05.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Ted Hardie
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-safe-method-w-body-06.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org

Sunday, 20 October 2024

• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Mark Nottingham
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Stephen Farrell
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Mark Nottingham
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Stephen Farrell
• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 19 October 2024

• Re: I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt Stephen Farrell
• I-D Action: draft-pauly-httpbis-geoip-hint-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt Michael Toomim
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-00.txt Josh Cohen

Friday, 18 October 2024

• Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-groups-02 Tommy Pauly
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-00.txt Michael Toomim

Friday, 11 October 2024

• Comment on draft "The HTTP QUERY Method" Theissen, Heiko

Wednesday, 16 October 2024

• WRAP_UP Capsule David Schinazi
• Compression dictionary support - now live in Chrome 130 Patrick Meenan
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt Kazuho Oku
• Re: 103 Early Hints Stefan Eissing
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt Lucas Pardue
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt Kazuho Oku
• Re: 103 Early Hints Willy Tarreau
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt Martin Thomson
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt Lucas Pardue
• Re: 103 Early Hints Kazuho Oku

Tuesday, 15 October 2024

• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt Kazuho Oku
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt Kazuho Oku
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-00.txt Lisa Dusseault
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-00.txt Josh Cohen
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Josh Cohen
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt Lucas Pardue
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt Marius Kleidl
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kazuho-httpbis-incremental-http-00.txt Kazuho Oku
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Rahul Gupta

Sunday, 13 October 2024

• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8138) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8138) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8138) Julian Reschke
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Michael Toomim
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Michael Toomim

Saturday, 12 October 2024

• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Josh Cohen
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Josh Cohen
• [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9110 (8138) RFC Errata System
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-secondary-server-certs-01.txt internet-drafts@ietf.org
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Josh Cohen

Friday, 11 October 2024

• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Mark Nottingham
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Michael Toomim
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Mark Nottingham
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Michael Toomim
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Michael Toomim

Thursday, 10 October 2024

• Re: Review of draft-toomim-httpbis-versions-00 Michael Toomim
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Martin Thomson
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Michael Sweet
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Ben Schwartz
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Ilari Liusvaara
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Mark Nottingham
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Michael Toomim

Wednesday, 9 October 2024

• Re: RFC 9651 on Structured Field Values for HTTP Mark Nottingham
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Josh Cohen
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Michael Toomim
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Watson Ladd
• Re: RFC 9651 on Structured Field Values for HTTP Julian Reschke
• Re: Invalid Characters in URLs Greg Wilkins
• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Marius Kleidl

Tuesday, 8 October 2024

• Re: Proposal: Adopt State Synchronization into HTTPbis Michael Toomim
• Re: Invalid Characters in URLs Rob Sayre

Friday, 4 October 2024

• Re: Possible need for new 3xx status code Temporarily See Other Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Structured type of Client-Cert and Client-Cert-Chain Justin Richer

Thursday, 3 October 2024

• Re: RFC 9651 on Structured Field Values for HTTP Evert Pot

Tuesday, 1 October 2024

• RE: Possible need for new 3xx status code Temporarily See Other Belov, Charles
• Re: Structured type of Client-Cert and Client-Cert-Chain Mark Nottingham
• Re: Structured type of Client-Cert and Client-Cert-Chain Brian Campbell
• Re: Structured type of Client-Cert and Client-Cert-Chain Lucas Pardue
• Re: Structured type of Client-Cert and Client-Cert-Chain Mark Nottingham
• Re: Structured type of Client-Cert and Client-Cert-Chain Lucas Pardue
• Re: Structured type of Client-Cert and Client-Cert-Chain Mark Nottingham
• Fwd: Structured type of Client-Cert and Client-Cert-Chain Brian Campbell
• RE: Httpdir telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata-10 Michael Jones

Last message date: Thursday, 31 October 2024 10:05:47 UTC