- From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 11:35:47 -0700
- To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, tpauly@apple.com, tpauly@apple.com
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Like Deb, I would like to understand the need for the static prefix data in section 3.3 as well. For Section 3.1, is there a reason the SubjectPublicKeyInfo (SPKI) structure cannot be used? That way, the Public Key Encoding does not have to be redefined for any new/other algorithms? (kind of on the fence whether this should be a DISCUSS)
Received on Tuesday, 17 September 2024 18:35:52 UTC