Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9421 (8102)

I have reviewed the text and can confirm that this errata is correct and should be marked verified. This is the same error as in the other section, also reported in a separate errata.

- Justin
________________________________
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2024 12:15 AM
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: taka@authlete.com <taka@authlete.com>; richanna@amazon.com <richanna@amazon.com>; ietf@justin.richer.org <ietf@justin.richer.org>; msporny@digitalbazaar.com <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>; ietf-http-wg@w3.org <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9421 (8102)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9421,
"HTTP Message Signatures".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8102

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Takahiko Kawasaki <taka@authlete.com>

Section: 7.2.8

Original Text
-------------
"@status": 200
"content-digest": \
  sha-256=:X48E9qOokqqrvdts8nOJRJN3OWDUoyWxBf7kbu9DBPE=:
"@signature-input": ("@status" "content-digest")

Corrected Text
--------------
"@status": 200
"content-digest": \
  sha-256=:X48E9qOokqqrvdts8nOJRJN3OWDUoyWxBf7kbu9DBPE=:
"@signature-params": ("@status" "content-digest")

Notes
-----
"@signature-input" should be changed to "@signature-params".

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it
will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

--------------------------------------
RFC9421 (draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures-19)
--------------------------------------
Title               : HTTP Message Signatures
Publication Date    : February 2024
Author(s)           : A. Backman, Ed., J. Richer, Ed., M. Sporny
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : HTTP
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG