Re: Method Mania

Thanks, I was just pondering potential ways to deal with middle boxes or
other infrastructure by detecting their support.

On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 3:45 AM Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 02.08.2024 21:44, Josh Cohen wrote:
> > Thanks for the clarification.  Looking at the http2 rfc9113[1], bottom
> > of section 8.3.1, says:
> > "Individual HTTP/2 requests do not carry an explicit indicator of
> > protocol version. All HTTP/2 requests implicitly have a protocol version
> > of "2.0""
> >
> > So, there's no longer an explicit version string, or header.
> >
> > The reason I asked was when considering new methods.  The option of
> > revving the version of the messaging/semantics layer isn't feasible.
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9113#section-8.3.1
> > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9113#section-8.3.1>
>
> There's no problem introducing new methods. The method registry is
> completely orthogonal to the HTTP version.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>
>

-- 

---
*Josh Co*hen