Re: Feedback on "Compression Dictionary Transport" draft.

The message was received, considered and determined to be inactionable.

If you have specific areas where you believe assumptions are being made
that are not sufficiently grounded in explanation or citations then please
file issues with as much detail as possible.

If you have implementation experience where you are concerned about
interop, backwards compatibility, privacy or security with the draft,
please file specific issues with those concerns (again, with as much detail
as possible).

On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 8:12 AM Shyamal Chandra <shyamalc@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Did anyone get this message or was it simply ignored?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Best,
>
> Shyamal Chandra
> shyamalc@gmail.com
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 11:20 PM Shyamal Chandra <shyamalc@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Hope you are all well!
>>
>> As an expert in networking and AI, I just skimmed very quickly through
>> the draft of "Compression Dictionary Transport" and in my opinion, it feels
>> incomplete, doesn't have any ASCII diagrams, is not from first principles,
>> and the flow of the document is sort of abrupt without clear definitions of
>> all the terms.  Thus, I would highly recommend that the authors rewrite it
>> to reveal all the details and make everything crystal clear.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Shyamal Chandra
>> shyamalc@gmail.com
>> bento.com/shyamal
>> linkedin.com/in/shyamalc
>> shyamalchandra.com
>>
>>