Hi Glenn,
Thank you for the suggestion!
I opened an issue <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/2815>
and a corresponding PR <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/2816>.
Please feel free to leave any comments or suggestions.
Best,
Nidhi
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 3:36 PM Glenn Strauss <
gs-lists-ietf-http-wg@gluelogic.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 04:19:44PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> > Working Group participants,
> >
> > This e-mail announces Working Group Last Call for revision 00 of the
> following document:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-zstd-window-size/
> >
> > This is a very straightforward document. Please review and raise any
> issues you find (preferably on GitHub, but also acceptable on-list) and
> indicate whether you support publication (or object to it) in response to
> this message.
>
> I support publication.
>
> Minor suggestion in 1. Introduction, which begins:
> Zstandard, or "zstd", specified in [RFC8878], is a lossless data
> compression mechanism similar to gzip. When used with HTTP, the
> "zstd" content coding token signals to the decoder that the content
> is Zstandard-compressed.
> and ends
> This document updates [RFC8878] to enforce Window_Size limits on the
> encoder and decoder for the "zstd" content coding.
>
> While not strictly necessary, I think it might be clearer to repeat that
> the requirement is for the "zstd" **HTTP** content coding, e.g.
> This document updates [RFC8878] to enforce Window_Size limits on the
> encoder and decoder for the "zstd" HTTP content coding.
>
> Cheers, Glenn
>