- From: Stewart Bryant via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
- Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 06:24:01 -0800
- To: <gen-art@ietf.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis.all@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, last-call@ietf.org
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-05 Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2024-02-17 IETF LC End Date: 2024-02-12 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary:A well written document and apart from the missing reference ready to go. Major issues:None Minor issues:None Nits/editorial comments: ID-Nits reports: Missing Reference: 'RFC3986' is mentioned on line 285, but not defined ====== Example-List: sugar, tea, rum At one level an innocent grocery list, however I imagine that in 2024 there may need to be multiple trigger warnings on the items chosen.
Received on Saturday, 17 February 2024 14:24:05 UTC