- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 18:05:24 +1100
- To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
- Cc: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Carsten! > On 30 Jan 2024, at 2:38 am, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: > > On 2024-01-29, at 15:41, Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com> wrote: >> >> What parts of [I-D.draft-bray-unichars] is the reader supposed to look at? Or if it is the whole document, could we have some context around it? > > It seems that sfbis refers to Unicode codepoints where it should have referred to Unicode scalar values (what are said to be codepoints now, need to allow encoding in UTF-8, which only applies to Unicode scalar values). People seem to have strong and conflicting beliefs about the correct terminology here -- others have asserted the opposite in my recollection. So I'm afraid that before I'm willing to change the spec (again) I need see a reference supporting any assertions, and agreement on its interpretation. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2024 07:05:33 UTC