- From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:27:52 +1000
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
I'm surprised that you are running WGLC on the compression dictionary stuff rather than the zstd size draft. That latter one is baked. This one, less so (though Patrick has done a lot of solid work here). The part that concerns me (and I haven't heard from anyone - other than Patrick - about it) is the Use-As-Dictionary piece. For me, I have uncertainty about the viability of performing URL matching on every fetch. I am also not convinced that a wide array of sites will be able to make that sort of compression operationally feasible. Though I could be convinced otherwise, that part of this work is better suited to Experimental track than a Proposed Standard. This is not a comment about the quality of the document. As far as I can tell, it's complete and clear. On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, at 09:49, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Working Group participants, > > This e-mail announces Working Group Last Call for revision 05 of the > following document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-compression-dictionary/ > > There are no outstanding issues in GitHub, and the editors indicate > that they believe it is ready. > > Please review the document and raise any issues you find (preferably on > GitHub, but also acceptable on-list) and indicate whether you support > publication (or object to it) in response to this message. > > Working Group Last Call will end on 4 July 2024. > > Cheers, > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2024 01:28:17 UTC