Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7541 (7372)

The RFC Editor will take care of it.

RFC Editor, please reject this errata (or remove it, if you think that appropriate).

Cheers,


> On 28 Feb 2023, at 4:32 am, Jamal Moore <jamaltmoore@outlook.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> This is my first submission so I am not sure If there is something I have to do to with draw it.
> 
> Jamal 
> From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
> Sent: 27 February 2023 11:41
> To: Jamal Moore <jamaltmoore@outlook.com>
> Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>; fenix@google.com <fenix@google.com>; herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>; superuser@gmail.com <superuser@gmail.com>; francesca.palombini@ericsson.com <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>; mnot@mnot.net <mnot@mnot.net>; tpauly@apple.com <tpauly@apple.com>; ietf-http-wg@w3.org <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7541 (7372)
>  No problem, you're welcome. I'm guessing the errata can be rejected then but I'll leave that up to the rest of the folks on the errata report to state in a more official capacity.
> 
> Cheers,
> Lucas


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Monday, 27 February 2023 22:56:23 UTC