- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 07:38:07 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
-------- Mark Nottingham writes: > <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/2393> > > In the unlikely even that someone generates an 8941 > field that looks like a date type [...] s/unlikely/impossible/ No syntactic element in 8941 can begin with "@". > field that looks like a date type and it *is* parsed by an 8941 parser, s/8941 parser/8941bis parser/ ? > If this *is* a problem, what is a reasonable solution? There is no problem to solve. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 27 February 2023 07:38:24 UTC