Re: [IANA #1266617] expert review for draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures (http-fields)

The syntax in the examples is being checked in CI, and I've had a look from time to time, so I think we're good.

Cheers,


> On 15 Feb 2023, at 5:23 pm, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Feb 15, 2023, at 10:45 AM, David Dong via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Mark and Roy, (cc: httpbis WG),
>> 
>> As the designated experts for the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Field Name registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures for us? Please see
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-message-signatures/
>> 
>> The due date is March 1st, 2023.
>> 
>> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll make the registration at
>> 
>> https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-fields/
>> 
>> With thanks,
>> 
>> David Dong
>> IANA Services Specialist
> 
> The proposed permanent registrations for Signature-Input, Signature, and Accept-Signature look OK to me.
> 
> I assume Mark has already reviewed the examples in the spec. I haven't verified that the structured syntax is consistent with the definitions.
> 
> ....Roy T. Fielding
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Thursday, 16 February 2023 22:36:26 UTC